Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:43:03 +0100
From:      Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>
To:        Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:25.kmem
Message-ID:  <20061206134303.GA63129@ei.bzerk.org>
In-Reply-To: <200612060626.31834.josh@tcbug.org>
References:  <200612060933.kB69XErN083086@freefall.freebsd.org> <45769654.5050307@freebsd.org> <200612060626.31834.josh@tcbug.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:26:31AM -0600, Josh Paetzel typed:
> On Wednesday 06 December 2006 04:07, Colin Percival wrote:
> > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
> > > FreeBSD-SA-06:25.kmem                                      
> > > Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project ...
> > > III. Impact
> > >
> > > A user in the "operator" group can read the contents of kernel
> > > memory. Such memory might contain sensitive information, such as
> > > portions of the file cache or terminal buffers.  This information
> > > might be directly useful, or it might be leveraged to obtain
> > > elevated privileges in some way; for example, a terminal buffer
> > > might include a user-entered password.
> >
> > For what it's worth, there was a lot of debate about whether this
> > deserved an advisory: Members of the operator group are allowed (by
> > default, at least) to read raw disk devices, so being able to read
> > kernel memory really isn't very much of a privilege escalation.  In
> > the end I decided to go ahead with this advisory largely because we
> > were already planning on issuing an advisory this week (for a far
> > more serious issue in GNU tar), but if a similar issue arises next
> > month, we might decide not to bother with an advisory.
> >
> > I'd be interested to hear opinions from the FreeBSD community about
> > whether this sort of issue is one which anyone really cares about.
> >
> > Colin Percival
> > FreeBSD Security Officer
> 
> Sure, and if you can read raw disk devices you can 
> read /etc/master.passwd and /etc/group....and if you can do that then 
> it's trivial to break the passwords you need to su to someone in 
> wheel and then su to root.
> 
> I guess my point is someone in the operator group has a far easier way 
> to gain root than this vuln.

True, but only in the default configuration. The reading of raw disk
devices really is controlled by filesystem privileges:

# ls -l /dev/ad4
crw-r-----  1 root  operator    0,  84 Dec  6 08:50 /dev/ad4

So you could for example remove the read bit for operators on some devices,
while still allowing them to dump/backup some other specific devices.

This isn't the case for kmem:

# ls -l /dev/kmem
crw-r-----  1 root  kmem    0,  25 Dec  6 08:50 /dev/kmem

In my opinion that makes this a bug and a security issue.

Ruben de Groot




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061206134303.GA63129>