From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Aug 30 18:58:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA13967
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA13959
          for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id SAA19946; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 18:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199608310157.SAA19946@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jfieber@indiana.edu
CC: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.3.95.960830085948.5578P-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> (message from John Fieber on Fri, 30 Aug 1996 09:20:01 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: Should this port go in ?
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * The idea I had was to modify install to (optionally) log
 * installations.  The logging could be controlled either through

This is a really cool idea.  But install is not the only program that
is used, there is cp (I know this is wrong), touch, tar, and maybe
cpio.  And the whole directory copies that use tar/cpio is the ones
that are most hard to keep track of.

Satoshi