From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Oct 31 11:25:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA04228 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 11:25:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp04.wxs.nl (smtp04.wxs.nl [195.121.6.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA04222 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 11:25:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from diabolique.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.58.57]) by smtp04.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA10A2; Sat, 31 Oct 1998 20:25:12 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 20:28:53 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Al Stodolski Subject: RE: Linux emulation Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 31-Oct-98 Al Stodolski wrote: > Is there a compromise in performance for anyone who runs Linux apps using > emulation in FreeBSD? I'm finding very few apps out there built > specifically for FreeBSD. I'm recalling how badly the Mac OS ran Windows > apps using an emulation package called SoftPC. Ehm, ye might want to try the ports, and most of the programs out there have been tested with a BSD flavour of some sort, be it FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD or SunOS to name a few... I find a lot of programs to run in one make... --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai asmodai(at)wxs.nl Junior Network/Security Specialist FreeBSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message