From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 12:28:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97AB16A4C0 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDB243FB1 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:28:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8736066B04; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7698F9BC; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 12:28:02 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Matthew Seaman , RA Cohen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030822192802.GB97519@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030822152451.20933.qmail@web13903.mail.yahoo.com> <20030822155257.GA92716@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030822155257.GA92716@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.8 vs 2.2.8a on 4.8 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 19:28:04 -0000 --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Ports are intended to compile and work on any supported version of the > OS (at the moment 4.7-RELEASE, 4.8-RELEASE, 4.8-STABLE, 5.1-RELEASE, > 5-CURRENT, although a few ports won't work on all those versions for > various reasons) Ports will quite often compile/work on just about any > version of the OS. Not quite..only the most recent release (and later stable/current) is officially supported. It's true that in most cases you can continue to use it successfully on older releases. > Similarly the packages built from ports should work on any version > with a compatible set of shared libraries, although all things being > equal, the packages tend to work best on the suported OS versions. > Hence packages built for 4-STABLE should work on any 4.x version since > about 4.4-RELEASE, and packages built for recent 5.x should work on > any 5-CURRENT or 5.x-RELEASE -- 5-CURRENT is a far more elusive target > than 4.x at the moment, due to some fairly large scale ongoing work, > and portability isn't necessarily up to the usual high standard. This isn't guaranteed: in many cases (e.g. OpenSSL, ports like lsof that depend on kernel structures, ...) packages built for later releases cannot be run on earlier systems. FreeBSD doesn't provide this kind of "forwards compatibility", although it's only occasionally broken. Kris --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Rm7BWry0BWjoQKURAjwLAJ4y4bMoEupoC6YDYsbqWLwbtAS+/wCfSpz9 umiaXIv62N/Ksutpk5gb7jg= =RMsz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS--