From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jul  4 20:27:17 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA29980
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 20:27:17 -0700
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [198.137.146.49])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA29971
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 20:27:07 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id VAA22797; Tue, 4 Jul 1995 21:26:32 -0600
Message-Id: <199507050326.VAA22797@rover.village.org>
To: davidg@Root.COM
Subject: Re: another reason not to change 0.0.0.0 into 192.0.0.1 in PPP 
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 03 Jul 1995 22:58:16 PDT
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 1995 21:26:31 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I think that the original intent was to use 192.2.0.1, which is
officially a test network and someone got confused :-).

Warner