Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 09:23:06 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-lists@be-well.ilk.org> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, dteske@freebsd.org, devin.teske@fisglobal.com Subject: Re: lots of network interfaces Message-ID: <44boasodo5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303090815270.72001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:16:20 %2B0100 (CET)") References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303071222550.10489@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <031201ce1b91$841b90d0$8c52b270$@freebsd.org> <44y5dx3gx3.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303090815270.72001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes: >>> very usable at that point, ifconfig aside). >> >> The interfaces are a linked list, plus there's a separate kernel dive >> for each interface. The list (as opposed to individual interfaces) is > > i don't care how fast ifconfig displays them, just for how fast things > like routing or ipfw rule like "via tun196" would work. > > if it is hashed somehow - fine. > if not - very bad. Not an issue, as I explained in a part of the message that you clipped out.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44boasodo5.fsf>