From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 4 15:57:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B41065744 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 15:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161458FC15 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 15:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADE1337AF4 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 11:57:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 May 2009 11:57:37 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: /HgJfJ6bJXTlTRQTLaspC3sZFBlK6FnGMmJSuWbrR+hU 1241452656 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDFA429049 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 11:57:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49FF106D.1060507@incunabulum.net> Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 16:57:33 +0100 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: CARP and IPv6 SSM changes -- call for feedback X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 15:57:38 -0000 Hi, Could any CARP users tracking -current let me know if they see any issues with CARP since last week's merge of MLDv2 / SSM in IPv6? Please let me know, I have tried to convert its semantics to the SSM KPI's -- the most intrusive change to carp is to adapt it to how the SSM capable IPv6 stack tracks multicast memberships. This shouldn't impact the functionality of CARP, but if I've missed something, please let me know -- it was a fairly quick refactoring w/o knowing all of the internals of CARP as currently implemented. thanks, BMS