From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 12 11:23:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA15181 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 11:23:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from delphi.bsd.uchicago.edu (delphi.bsd.uchicago.edu [128.135.5.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA15159 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 11:23:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from bio-5.bsd.uchicago.edu (bio-5.bsd.uchicago.edu [128.135.75.14]) by delphi.bsd.uchicago.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3/BSD-4.0) with SMTP id NAA05202; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 13:23:19 -0600 (CST) Received: by bio-5.bsd.uchicago.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA00940; Tue, 12 Nov 1996 13:23:17 +0600 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 13:23:17 +0600 Message-Id: <9611121923.AA00940@bio-5.bsd.uchicago.edu> To: carrera@idirect.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: (message from Jason Lixfeld on Tue, 12 Nov 1996 12:10:28 -0500 (EST)) Subject: Re: New FreeBSD Box From: Tim Pierce Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm running 2.1.5 quite comfortably on a 486SX with 8MB RAM. No prizes for speed, but response time is pretty good. When I have gcc and Emacs running at once I get a little swapping. However, I'm not running X11, and suspect that your performance will drop noticeably if you do.