From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Jul 2 0: 7: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp5.jps.net (smtp5.jps.net [209.63.224.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E749A1502A for ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:07:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ulairi@jps.net) Received: from ulairi (208-237-196-86.irv.jps.net [208.237.196.86]) by smtp5.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA01094 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:07:02 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ulairi" To: "Smp" Subject: Got a curious question from someone about re-entrant vs non-re-entrant kernels Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:06:52 -0700 Message-ID: <007601bec459$765b9740$56c4edd0@ulairi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 | -----Original Message----- | From: Len Huppe [mailto:huppe@execpc.com] | Sent: Thursday, July 01, 1999 20:02 | To: Ulairi | Subject: Re: reentrant kernel | | | If I were to go out and buld an SMP system tomorrow, what kind of | performance increase should I realistically expect from a | fully reentrant | kernel vs. a non-reentrant kernel? My own experience in that area is too limited to give a decent answer. Perhaps you guys could tell Len (and myself please :) ) General Purpose Computer Geek California State University, Northridge College of Engineering and Computer Science 18111 Nordhoff St, Post Stop 8295 Northridge, CA 91330 ulairi@jps.net ulairi@ecs.csun.edu ntadmin@ecs.csun.edu secadmin@ecs.csun.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i iQA/AwUBN3xjVlR8Yh25VFLEEQKKJgCgkhWurxNiazYrM4CETwJNjyO1xrgAn2Xt z0tU1qzQ0FY5tSMRrZg5EWUs =yvj6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message