From owner-cvs-all Thu Sep 19 9:32:52 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF8937B401; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.default-network.net (newtrinity.default-network.net [62.159.128.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFFB43E75; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 09:32:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from corex@newtrinity.default-network.net) Received: from newtrinity.default-network.net (markus@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newtrinity.default-network.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/DEFAULT-NETWORK.NET) with ESMTP id g8JGWl4H036693; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:32:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from corex@newtrinity.default-network.net) Received: (from corex@localhost) by newtrinity.default-network.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8JGWlMu036692; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:32:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from corex) Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:32:47 +0200 From: marius@alchemy.franken.de To: Alexander Leidinger Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, pmarquis@pobox.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/stlport-icc Makefile pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20020919183247.W70075@newtrinity.default-network.net> References: <200209171301.g8HD1Qku017998@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020917203051.J49547@newtrinity.default-network.net> <20020918095311.164d7b69.Alexander@Leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020918095311.164d7b69.Alexander@Leidinger.net>; from Alexander@Leidinger.net on Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:53:11AM +0200 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 09:53:11AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 20:30:51 +0200 marius@alchemy.franken.de wrote: > > > > It doesn't compile on -current at the moment because of some gcc > > > specific system headers. > > > > > > > Uhm, are you sure ? It compiled and worked with -current as of about a > > week ago. That said the recent changes to libc_r (vs. libpthread) that > > Uhm... then one of my icc patches for the __GNUC__ parts of the system > includes is wrong... > That would explain it, stlport-icc at least compiles with stock -current as of last night + libc_r fix of today and the exception handling and the stl regression tests work. > > ICC C++ support depends on might have broken it. Usability of ICC > > under-current in general (for compiling both, C and C++ code) is > > limited because of GCC specific code in the system headers. > > It was supposed that my patches reduce this limit. Damn. > Your pachtes seem to mainly bring compilation of the kernel with ICC closer but don't fix __GNUC__ stuff in the includes for average userland apps plus ICC is not 100% GCC-compatible and therefore expanding '#ifdef __GNUC__' to '#if defined __GNUC__ || defined__ICC' isn't necessarily the right thing (but can be, of course). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message