Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:45:15 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@me.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: fcp@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Developers <developers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Announcing the 'FreeBSD Community Process' Message-ID: <536D30FA-42CF-4F7F-9AE3-70B0822977C3@me.com> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrviwexDJXbA6hK6GiJkdME1N7VZfYUvj1i9WNw-qG-hA@mail.gmail.com> References: <539e27d3-4eca-463a-75d4-667d3fec90f6@FreeBSD.org> <f6c69173-bd27-c5a7-7b61-611564fc4d30@FreeBSD.org> <B72BD46B-0CBD-4517-9C90-5AC4A5D61FF3@me.com> <CANCZdfrviwexDJXbA6hK6GiJkdME1N7VZfYUvj1i9WNw-qG-hA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 14, 2017, at 14:20, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >=20 > It was explained at bsdcan the the vote is primarily for "this repents = the general consensus" rather than, this is the direction we should go. = If the fcp doesn't match consensus then it will be voted no. That=E2=80=99s what you think will happen, but the FCP doesn=E2=80=99t = say anything about that and the interpretations of the community and = core might be different. It just seems like a bad model for core to try to interpret everyone=E2=80= =99s feedback and then vote on it. If people provide feedback and say = something like =E2=80=9CAPPROVE=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9CNEEDS = DISCUSSION=E2=80=9D, it will make the process much more transparent. The vote should come from the people providing feedback. I see no = reason why core needs to vote on other people=E2=80=99s feedback. =E2=80=94 Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?536D30FA-42CF-4F7F-9AE3-70B0822977C3>