From owner-freebsd-commit Fri Aug 4 06:39:59 1995 Return-Path: commit-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA11479 for commit-outgoing; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 06:39:59 -0700 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA11464 for cvs-user-outgoing; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 06:39:56 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA11452 ; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 06:39:50 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA15480; Fri, 4 Aug 1995 14:38:25 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199508041338.OAA15480@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/libexec/telnetd ext.h To: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 14:38:24 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@freebsd.org, ache@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-user@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199508041311.PAA21140@grumble.grondar.za> from "Mark Murray" at Aug 4, 95 03:11:01 pm Reply-to: paul@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1204 Sender: commit-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Mark Murray who said > > > Hmm, I obviously haven't been paying enough attention but can someone > > explain to me why we have two telnetd's in the tree? > > The one in secure is secure. It includes unexportable crypto code. Umm, yeah I sort of knew that, but why do we have a non-exportable version sitting in the main tree? Despite paying quite close attention to all the crypto discussions I've clearly missed something. I though we segregated the non-exportable stuff into secure so that we knew where it all was and could ship it as a separate module. One module in the US built from secure/* and another for the rest of the world built and shipped from your site. What happens to /usr/src/libexec/telnetd in all this? > > > Incidentally, I didn't ifdef my change since I didn't see much point > > in keeping 4.4 BSD as the default string since 4.4 is defunct so no-one's > > ever going to use it again. > > Eh? You sure? :-) Positive :-) We're freeBSD now and will be forever more. -- Paul Richards, Bluebird Computer Systems. FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.freebsd.org/~paul Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1222 457651 (home)