From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 24 08:45:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC85616A4CE for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 08:45:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D1E43D45 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 08:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (wojtek@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6O8jpjX075103; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:45:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)i6O8joFa075100; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:45:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 10:45:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Chris Keladis In-Reply-To: <268f570d04072400031d0ae080@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20040724104435.P75024@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <268f570d04072400031d0ae080@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vinum. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 08:45:55 -0000 > drive e device /dev/da5s1e > drive f device /dev/da6s1e > volume raid10 > plex org striped 512k > sd length 0 drive a > sd length 0 drive b > sd length 0 drive c > plex org striped 512k > sd length 0 drive d > sd length 0 drive e > sd length 0 drive f > > I havent done any profiling but it "feels" a little slow to me. > Thought i'd talk to others to see what their using and see if i should > restructure my volume. > with linear read it will get speed of one drive, linear write - a bit slower (2 writes must be done but in parallel). BUT: with 100 processes reading different things from it it could be up to 6 times faster (actually bit less as it will never get spread evenly) than single drive. writes near 3 times faster.