Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:47:51 +0100 From: Alessandro de Manzano <demanzano@iol.it> To: Peter Brezny <peter@sysadmin-inc.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sandbox clarification. Message-ID: <20001215234751.A305@libero.sunshine.ale> In-Reply-To: <003001c066f5$6b4860a0$46010a0a@sysadmininc.com>; from peter@sysadmin-inc.com on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:16:20PM -0800 References: <003001c066f5$6b4860a0$46010a0a@sysadmininc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Sorry for the confusion, I'll use the more clear terminology (unpriviliged > user, jail, chroot) rather than the lame sandbox descriptor in the future. thanks for your clarification! :-) > if you are running named under an unpriviliged user, is it still a good idea > (worth the extra time and headache) to set it up to run in a chrooted > environment? I guess yes, also if could be a bit "difficult" the first time. If that daemon fails and starts crunching your machine, at least does not eat it all :-) -- bye! Ale demanzano@iol.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001215234751.A305>