From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 30 19:27:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC6D106566C; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3A68FC17; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA17702; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:27:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Svvcr-0003ie-UQ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:27:34 +0300 Message-ID: <5016E023.2080108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:27:31 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120728 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <3CE55F29-A5B2-44A7-8854-1ED38BAE6F16@FreeBSD.org> <201207300931.13116.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201207300931.13116.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: George Neville-Neil , arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: aio in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:27:36 -0000 on 30/07/2012 16:31 John Baldwin said the following: > On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:43:42 am George Neville-Neil wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I was wondering why aio is not yet in GENERIC. Now that it's properly >> locked and all. > > GENERIC does have it as a module so 'kldload aio' or 'aio_load=YES' in > loader.conf works for folks who need it. > The same could be said about many other drivers that are in GENERIC _kernel_. So, what was your point? :-) -- Andriy Gapon