Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jun 1998 07:59:36 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
To:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Size of a port...
Message-ID:  <199806180559.HAA18593@rfhs8028.fh-regensburg.de>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199806160519.OAA24788@cain.gsoft.com.au> you wrote:
> > A few people have expressed interest in a file being stored with every port
> > that contains the size of the installed port.  Here are a few lines that coul
> > be added to bsd.port.mk to create such a file.  Please let me know what you
> > think.
> This would be a bit useless for an ftp install..
> You have to have it before you can see how big it will be :)
> A seperate info file about each package would be better.. Maybe..

How about generating pkg_create generate this information automatically
and putting it into the port's +CONTENTS file. Then teach pkg_info some
"give me the size of a port" option to retrieve it, which will then 
work for installed and uninstalled packages, of the latter not caring 
if they are on the local machine or available via some ftp:// URL.

For the ftp-install, you'd have to "pkg_info -s ftp://.../foo.tgz"
instead of downloading the size-file manually, which I think would be
acceptable.

Also, associating a port with any size of some (compiled binary)
package seems a bit misleading to me, as the size may vary if e.g.
some dependant (static) lib changes, or you might not even know
what compiler-toolchain the building user's using (or even which
architecture :-).


 - Hubert

-- 
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806180559.HAA18593>