From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Apr 21 01:50:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA00143
          for stable-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 01:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.Contrib.Com (mail.Contrib.Com [194.77.12.8])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA00136
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 01:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from src@localhost)
          by mail.Contrib.Com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id KAA26590; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 10:49:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 10:49:59 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199704210849.KAA26590@mail.Contrib.Com>
From: Heiko Blume <src@contrib.com>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: should/can i sup to 2.1.7.1?
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

hi,

i run a 2-1.STABLE as of somewhere in september.
about once a month the machine produces a panic,
possibly due to async mounts, that seems to
hose some files once in while. i don't use
async mounts anymore, but i read about some
adaptec problem that might also be a cause.

so, can i use my good ol' sup installation
for 2.1-stable to get 2.1.7.1 without further ado?

should i, stabiltity-wise? the machine is far away,
and i don't intend to travel...

TIA, hb