Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Mar 2019 15:59:11 -0600
From:      Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bluestop.org>
To:        D Scott Phillips <d.scott.phillips@intel.com>
Cc:        Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Updating uefi-edk2-bhyve
Message-ID:  <4fb370c4-0358-8ca7-67ee-c98fd83d2740@bluestop.org>
In-Reply-To: <b2f90a4c-d73f-6797-aa1e-62161ad011f5@bluestop.org>
References:  <86muln68ld.fsf@intel.com> <1fe3ca3f-be70-99db-e7c0-35c9194c97e4@bluestop.org> <7e84fd01c3f46268c26f9bab8b9fb9bc@lerctr.org> <33fcf111-fe00-4ec7-8a2f-7c53246d756f@Spark> <86k1gqanx8.fsf@intel.com> <8c63eb87-e3b8-2365-2eaf-a6e36424407c@bluestop.org> <86ftremzar.fsf@intel.com> <b2f90a4c-d73f-6797-aa1e-62161ad011f5@bluestop.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/22/19 4:29 PM, Rebecca Cran via freebsd-virtualization wrote:
> On 3/22/19 2:25 PM, D Scott Phillips wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I guess it might be some diference in the code generation between
>> gcc 4.8 and gcc 5.
>
>
> I've just tested switching from gcc 4.8 to 8.3.0 and everything seems 
> to work fine - both build and runtime - so I think it may be more 
> productive to upgrade and use that instead, since it's a supported 
> version (gcc 4.8 is pretty old now). Would you agree?


I've submitted a couple of merge requests to update your edk2 tree and 
port for gcc 8:


https://gitlab.com/scott-ph/edk2/merge_requests/1

https://gitlab.com/scott-ph/freebsd-ports/merge_requests/1


-- 

Rebecca Cran




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4fb370c4-0358-8ca7-67ee-c98fd83d2740>