From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 17 00:05:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA9F16A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:05:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [65.173.111.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EE143D2D for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:05:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6H05mwZ081678 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:05:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id i6H05mX1081675; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:05:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:05:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: freebsder In-Reply-To: <20040716211151.53557.qmail@web52509.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20040716180028.W81658@wonkity.com> References: <20040716211151.53557.qmail@web52509.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:05:48 -0600 (MDT) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 <-> WinXP Networking Problem UPDATE #2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 00:05:50 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, freebsder wrote: > Hi Chuck, > > This is what I get: > > # ipfw -a list > 00100 49820 12066079 allow ip from any to any > 00100 0 0 allow tcp from any to any > 65535 2 96 deny ip from any to any > > The Second and Third lines don't seem right.. What do > I need to do correct the problem here. First, you need to stop top-posting, which makes it difficult to reply. If you carefully read Chuck's response to you: > There's likely to be a problem with /etc/rc/firewall, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ He's trying to tell you that should be /etc/rc.firewall (note the dot). -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA