Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:11:18 -0700
From:      Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
To:        "Long, Scott" <Scott_Long@adaptec.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cdrtools doesn't build on -current
Message-ID:  <20021018211118.GK19874@procyon.firepipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD161CAD8@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com>
References:  <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD161CAD8@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:57:33PM -0400, Long, Scott wrote:
> Changes due to standards compliance, architecture changes, etc, all
> wreak havoc on ports, and hopefully the pace of that will slow down.
> Unfortunately, the direction of FreeBSD is what it is, and the onus is
> on the ports maintainers to keep their ports up to date and working.

Uh, no, I disagree.  The onus is on the people who break things
to fix them, or at the very least *attempt* to provide methods to
fix things.  People who maintain ports are less likely to know
the appropriate way to fix something than the people who broke it
in the first place.  Standards compliance, architectural changes,
etc. are all not things usually considered in the realm of ports.
Probably because ports uses third party software which may also
work on other OS's.

Regards,
-- 
wca

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021018211118.GK19874>