From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 30 13:50:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B45316A403; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) From: David Xu To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:50:05 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200610301649.26429.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610302150.05499.davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: gnn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libthr status X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:50:15 -0000 On Monday 30 October 2006 18:25, gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > > 1.6) setrlimit for number of kenrel threads, it is not done, one-day > > work. > > Cool that it's only a day. Is this something you're hacking on now? > I will hack at kernel side, but who will hack userland utilities ? e.g the /usr/bin/limits program. > > 1.7 CPU binding API, not done in libthr, found in other OSes. libpthread > > does not support it either. > > > > 1.8 C++ object unwinding when pthread_exit is called(), I found it > > is support by debian Linux and Solaris, I have sample implementation > > for libthr. > > Cool as well, though not as big a deal as setrlimit. > > > 1.9) I forgot something. > > > > 2) Things can only be used by root: > > > > 2.1) the real-time scheduling options can only be used by root, e.g, > > if you call pthread_attr_setschedpolicy() with parameter SCHED_FIFO > > or SCHED_RR, the thread can only be created by root, normal user > > will get EPERM errno. you can use it in libpthread, but it is not > > real-time, it is a static priority scheduling in userland scheduler, > > if you want to preemptable other threads or processes in the system > > when playing real-time multimedia or military program, no way! > > > > 2.2) the real-time scheduling is not safe, it can deadlock itself and > > the whole system if program behavors incorrectly, it should only be > > used by trusted programs. > > Are these (can these be) documented in the man pages? > No, they are not documented. > Thanks, > George