From owner-freebsd-audit  Wed Feb  7 18:39:24 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (unknown [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9120D37B401
	for <FreeBSD-audit@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  7 Feb 2001 18:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f182d3997909;
	Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:39:03 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200102080239.f182d3997909@harmony.village.org>
To: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>
Subject: Re: lam(1) patch 
Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>,
	FreeBSD-audit <FreeBSD-audit@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:11:43 EST."
		<XFMail.20010207211143.mheffner@vt.edu> 
References: <XFMail.20010207211143.mheffner@vt.edu>  
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 19:39:03 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <XFMail.20010207211143.mheffner@vt.edu> Mike Heffner writes:
: Even though our implementation is inlined, I think I'll take
: Warner's suggestion so that it's clear. As I found out in the
: following, it wasn't what I would have expected:

Yes.  That's the point I was trying to make.  At one time your xlower
#define was considered "standards conforming" but times have changed.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message