From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 5 17:30:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EC81065677 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB8D8FC13 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vampire.homelinux.org (dslb-088-066-044-227.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.66.44.227]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lzpcx-1POerJ3jHv-01544q; Sat, 05 Jun 2010 19:30:51 +0200 Received: (qmail 96510 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2010 17:30:50 -0000 Received: from f8x64.laiers.local (192.168.4.188) by mx.laiers.local with SMTP; 5 Jun 2010 17:30:50 -0000 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 19:30:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (FreeBSD/8.0-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.4.3; amd64; ; ) References: <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> In-Reply-To: <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006051930.49804.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+9+btBBK1a8iGXqHjfTNkC/z6u5DFT7+VNwln J5Yr96UDlRIWj4ElVtABmRW+KaMWTL8HqZlomxHg//imhjTa10 QMH5JuCZqJBLCAj92Qhag== Cc: Adam PAPAI , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 17:30:53 -0000 On Saturday 05 June 2010 01:58:35 Adam PAPAI wrote: > Why FreeBSD is supreme with 1 and 2 thread. And why is it 2 and 3 times > slower with 4-8-16-32 threads compared to Debian? The first two tests (1 > thread and 2 thread) showed me that FreeBSD is supreme in I/O, but later > tests showed me, that it can produce horrible I/O. > > How can I tune my disk to make it faster? Is it possible? What is the > reason of the really slow I/O with more than 4 threads? What do you > recommend me to do? Why is it damn slow with 8K blocksize? You may find this interesting: http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/geom_sched/ Regards, Max