ALID (false, void, EnumFlag () >> 1) + +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, RE () <<= 1) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, RE () >>= 1) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, EF () <<= 1) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, EF () >>= 1) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, RawEnum () <<= 1) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, RawEnum () >>= 1) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, EnumFlag () <<= 1) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, EnumFlag () >>= 1) + + /* Test comparison operators. */ + +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, EF () == EF2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, EF () == RE2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, RE () == EF2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, EnumFlag () == EnumFlag2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, EnumFlag () == RawEnum2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, RawEnum () == EnumFlag2 ()) + +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EF (RE (1)) == EF (RE (1))) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EF (RE (1)) == RE (1)) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RE (1) == EF (RE (1))) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EnumFlag (RawEnum (1)) == EnumFlag (RawEnum (1))) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EnumFlag (RawEnum (1)) == RawEnum (1)) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RawEnum (1) == EnumFlag (RawEnum (1))) + +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, EF () != EF2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, EF () != RE2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (false, void, RE () != EF2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, EnumFlag () != EnumFlag2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, EnumFlag () != RawEnum2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (false, void, RawEnum () != EnumFlag2 ()) + + /* Disable -Wenum-compare due to: + +@@ -323,23 +325,23 @@ CHECK_VALID (false, void, RE () != EF2 ()) + # pragma GCC diagnostic push + # pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wenum-compare" + #endif +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RE () == RE2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RE () != RE2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RawEnum () == RawEnum2 ()) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RawEnum () != RawEnum2 ()) + #if defined __GNUC__ + # pragma GCC diagnostic pop + #endif + +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EF (RE (1)) != EF (RE (2))) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EF (RE (1)) != RE (2)) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RE (1) != EF (RE (2))) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EnumFlag (RawEnum (1)) != EnumFlag (RawEnum (2))) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EnumFlag (RawEnum (1)) != RawEnum (2)) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, RawEnum (1) != EnumFlag (RawEnum (2))) + +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EF () == 0) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, EnumFlag () == 0) + + /* Check we didn't disable/delete comparison between non-flags enums + and unrelated types by mistake. */ +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, NF (1) == NF (1)) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, NF (1) == int (1)) +-CHECK_VALID (true, bool, NF (1) == char (1)) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, NonFlagsEnum (1) == NonFlagsEnum (1)) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, NonFlagsEnum (1) == int (1)) ++CHECK_VALID (true, bool, NonFlagsEnum (1) == char (1)) + + /* -------------------------------------------------------------------- */ + diff --git a/devel/gdb/files/patch-gdb-15-branchpoint-1903-g4a0b2cb7210 b/devel/gdb/files/patch-gdb-15-branchpoint-1903-g4a0b2cb7210 new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..003c8d5dec33 --- /dev/null +++ b/devel/gdb/files/patch-gdb-15-branchpoint-1903-g4a0b2cb7210 @@ -0,0 +1,317 @@ +commit 4a0b2cb7210c65c8c9f4a56345749bb7294fbfbf +Author: Carlos Galvez +Date: 2024-12-21T22:25:40+01:00 + + Fix -Wenum-constexpr-conversion in enum-flags.h + + This fixes PR 31331: + https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31331 + + Currently, enum-flags.h is suppressing the warning + -Wenum-constexpr-conversion coming from recent versions of Clang. + This warning is intended to be made a compiler error + (non-downgradeable) in future versions of Clang: + + https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59036 + + The rationale is that casting a value of an integral type into an + enumeration is Undefined Behavior if the value does not fit in the + range of values of the enum: + https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1766 + + Undefined Behavior is not allowed in constant expressions, leading to + an ill-formed program. + + In this case, in enum-flags.h, we are casting the value -1 to an enum + of a positive range only, which is UB as per the Standard and thus not + allowed in a constexpr context. + + The purpose of doing this instead of using std::underlying_type is + because, for C-style enums, std::underlying_type typically returns + "unsigned int". However, when operating with it arithmetically, the + enum is promoted to *signed* int, which is what we want to avoid. + + This patch solves this issue as follows: + + * Use std::underlying_type and remove the custom enum_underlying_type. + + * Ensure that operator~ is called always on an unsigned integer. We do + this by casting the input enum into std::size_t, which can fit any + unsigned integer. We have the guarantee that the cast is safe, + because we have checked that the underlying type is unsigned. If the + enum had negative values, the underlying type would be signed. + + This solves the issue with C-style enums, but also solves a hidden + issue: enums with underlying type of std::uint8_t or std::uint16_t are + *also* promoted to signed int. Now they are all explicitly casted + to the largest unsigned int type and operator~ is safe to use. + + * There is one more thing that needs fix. Currently, operator~ is + implemented as follows: + + return (enum_type) ~underlying(e); + + After applying ~underlying(e), the result is a very large value, + which we then cast to "enum_type". This cast is Undefined Behavior + if the large value does not fit in the range of the enum. For + C++ enums (scoped and/or with explicit underlying type), the range + of the enum is the entire range of the underlying type, so the cast + is safe. However, for C-style enums, the range is the smallest + bit-field that can hold all the values of the enumeration. So the + range is a lot smaller and casting a large value to the enum would + invoke Undefined Behavior. + + To solve this problem, we create a new trait + EnumHasFixedUnderlyingType, to ensure operator~ may only be called + on C++-style enums. This behavior is roughly the same as what we + had on trunk, but relying on different properties of the enums. + + * Once this is implemented, the following tests fail to compile: + + CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? EF () : EF2 ()) + + This is because it expects the enums to be promoted to signed int, + instead of unsigned int (which is the true underlying type). + + I propose to remove these tests altogether, because: + + - The comment nearby say they are not very important. + - Comparing 2 enums of different type like that is strange, relies + on integer promotions and thus hurts readability. As per comments + in the related PR, we likely don't want this type of code in gdb + code anyway, so there's no point in testing it. + - Most importantly, this type of comparison will be ill-formed in + C++26 for regular enums, so enum_flags does not need to emulate + that. + + Since this is the only place where the warning was suppressed, remove + also the corresponding macro in include/diagnostics.h. + + The change has been tested by running the entire gdb test suite + (make check) and comparing the results (testsuite/gdb.sum) against + trunk. No noticeable differences have been observed. + + Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31331 + Tested-by: Keith Seitz + Approved-By: Tom Tromey + +diff --git gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c +index dddb1e26202..f192da37b41 100644 +--- gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c ++++ gdb/unittests/enum-flags-selftests.c +@@ -235,33 +235,6 @@ CHECK_VALID (true, UnsignedEnumFlag, ~UnsignedEnumFlag ()) + CHECK_VALID (true, EnumFlag, true ? EnumFlag () : RawEnum ()) + CHECK_VALID (true, EnumFlag, true ? RawEnum () : EnumFlag ()) + +-/* These are valid, but it's not a big deal since you won't be able to +- assign the resulting integer to an enum or an enum_flags without a +- cast. +- +- The latter two tests are disabled on older GCCs because they +- incorrectly fail with gcc 4.8 and 4.9 at least. Running the test +- outside a SFINAE context shows: +- +- invalid user-defined conversion from ‘EF’ to ‘RE2’ +- +- They've been confirmed to compile/pass with gcc 5.3, gcc 7.1 and +- clang 3.7. */ +- +-CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? EnumFlag () : EnumFlag2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? EnumFlag2 () : EnumFlag ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? EnumFlag () : RawEnum2 ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, int, true ? RawEnum2 () : EnumFlag ()) +- +-/* Same, but with an unsigned enum. */ +- +-using uns = unsigned int; +- +-CHECK_VALID (true, uns, true ? EnumFlag () : UnsignedEnumFlag ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, uns, true ? UnsignedEnumFlag () : EnumFlag ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, uns, true ? EnumFlag () : UnsignedRawEnum ()) +-CHECK_VALID (true, uns, true ? UnsignedRawEnum () : EnumFlag ()) +- + /* Unfortunately this can't work due to the way C++ computes the + return type of the ternary conditional operator. int isn't + implicitly convertible to the raw enum type, so the type of the +diff --git gdbsupport/enum-flags.h gdbsupport/enum-flags.h +index d3291e95d7e..71109bb8c99 100644 +--- gdbsupport/enum-flags.h ++++ gdbsupport/enum-flags.h +@@ -73,30 +73,6 @@ + namespace. The compiler finds the corresponding + is_enum_flags_enum_type function via ADL. */ + +-/* Note that std::underlying_type is not what we want here, +- since that returns unsigned int even when the enum decays to signed +- int. */ +-template class integer_for_size { using type = void; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<1, 0> { using type = uint8_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<2, 0> { using type = uint16_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<4, 0> { using type = uint32_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<8, 0> { using type = uint64_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<1, 1> { using type = int8_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<2, 1> { using type = int16_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<4, 1> { using type = int32_t; }; +-template<> struct integer_for_size<8, 1> { using type = int64_t; }; +- +-template +-struct enum_underlying_type +-{ +- DIAGNOSTIC_PUSH +- DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION +- using type +- = typename integer_for_size(T (-1) < T (0))>::type; +- DIAGNOSTIC_POP +-}; +- + namespace enum_flags_detail + { + +@@ -117,10 +93,61 @@ struct zero_type; + /* gdb::Requires trait helpers. */ + template + using EnumIsUnsigned +- = std::is_unsigned::type>; ++ = std::is_unsigned::type>; ++ ++/* Helper to detect whether an enum has a fixed underlying type. This can be ++ achieved by using a scoped enum (in which case the type is "int") or ++ an explicit underlying type. C-style enums that are unscoped or do not ++ have an explicit underlying type have an implementation-defined underlying ++ type. ++ ++ https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/dcl.enum#5 ++ ++ We need this trait in order to ensure that operator~ below does NOT ++ operate on old-style enums. This is because we apply operator~ on ++ the value and then cast the result to the enum_type. This is however ++ Undefined Behavior if the result does not fit in the range of possible ++ values for the enum. For enums with fixed underlying type, the entire ++ range of the integer is available. However, for old-style enums, the range ++ is only the smallest bit-field that can hold all the values of the ++ enumeration, typically much smaller than the underlying integer: ++ ++ https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/expr.static.cast#10 ++ https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/dcl.enum#8 ++ ++ To implement this, we leverage the fact that, since C++17, enums with ++ fixed underlying type can be list-initialized from an integer: ++ https://timsong-cpp.github.io/cppwp/n4659/dcl.init.list#3.7 ++ ++ Old-style enums cannot be initialized like that, leading to ill-formed ++ code. ++ ++ We then use this together with SFINAE to create the desired trait. ++ ++*/ ++template ++struct EnumHasFixedUnderlyingType : std::false_type ++{ ++ static_assert(std::is_enum::value); ++}; ++ ++/* Specialization that is active only if enum_type can be ++ list-initialized from an integer (0). Only enums with fixed ++ underlying type satisfy this property in C++17. */ + template +-using EnumIsSigned +- = std::is_signed::type>; ++struct EnumHasFixedUnderlyingType> : std::true_type ++{ ++ static_assert(std::is_enum::value); ++}; ++ ++template ++using EnumIsSafeForBitwiseComplement = std::conjunction< ++ EnumIsUnsigned, ++ EnumHasFixedUnderlyingType ++>; ++ ++template ++using EnumIsUnsafeForBitwiseComplement = std::negation>; + + } + +@@ -129,7 +156,7 @@ class enum_flags + { + public: + using enum_type = E; +- using underlying_type = typename enum_underlying_type::type; ++ using underlying_type = typename std::underlying_type::type; + + /* For to_string. Maps one enumerator of E to a string. */ + struct string_mapping +@@ -392,33 +419,41 @@ ENUM_FLAGS_GEN_COMP (operator!=, !=) + template , + typename +- = gdb::Requires>> ++ = gdb::Requires>> + constexpr enum_type + operator~ (enum_type e) + { + using underlying = typename enum_flags::underlying_type; +- return (enum_type) ~underlying (e); ++ /* Cast to ULONGEST first, to prevent integer promotions from enums ++ with fixed underlying type std::uint8_t or std::uint16_t to ++ signed int. This ensures we apply the bitwise complement on an ++ unsigned type. */ ++ return (enum_type)(underlying) ~ULONGEST (e); + } + + template , +- typename = gdb::Requires>> ++ typename = gdb::Requires>> + constexpr void operator~ (enum_type e) = delete; + + template , + typename +- = gdb::Requires>> ++ = gdb::Requires>> + constexpr enum_flags + operator~ (enum_flags e) + { + using underlying = typename enum_flags::underlying_type; +- return (enum_type) ~underlying (e); ++ /* Cast to ULONGEST first, to prevent integer promotions from enums ++ with fixed underlying type std::uint8_t or std::uint16_t to ++ signed int. This ensures we apply the bitwise complement on an ++ unsigned type. */ ++ return (enum_type)(underlying) ~ULONGEST (e); + } + + template , +- typename = gdb::Requires>> ++ typename = gdb::Requires>> + constexpr void operator~ (enum_flags e) = delete; + + /* Delete operator<< and operator>>. */ +diff --git include/diagnostics.h include/diagnostics.h +index 97e30ab807f..2a1d9b92fad 100644 +--- include/diagnostics.h ++++ include/diagnostics.h +@@ -76,11 +76,6 @@ + # define DIAGNOSTIC_ERROR_SWITCH \ + DIAGNOSTIC_ERROR ("-Wswitch") + +-# if __has_warning ("-Wenum-constexpr-conversion") +-# define DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION \ +- DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE ("-Wenum-constexpr-conversion") +-# endif +- + #elif defined (__GNUC__) /* GCC */ + + # define DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_DEPRECATED_DECLARATIONS \ +@@ -159,8 +154,4 @@ + # define DIAGNOSTIC_ERROR_SWITCH + #endif + +-#ifndef DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION +-# define DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_ENUM_CONSTEXPR_CONVERSION +-#endif +- + #endif /* DIAGNOSTICS_H */