From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 22 03:38:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB05106566B for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6E58FC18 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (cpe-24-175-90-48.tx.res.rr.com [24.175.90.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2586551B for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:38:58 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:38:59 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9CA3D4489328B8E911387EE0@Macintosh.local> In-Reply-To: <1206155440.6973.36.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <1206146157.6973.21.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20080322015851.GA97121@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <1206155440.6973.36.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: List replies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 03:38:59 -0000 --On March 22, 2008 1:10:40 PM +1000 Da Rock wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 02:58 +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> > This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a >> > reason why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of >> > the person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the >> list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only to the list. > > Well that certainly explains it, but it does surprise me. I thought > you'd have to subscribe to post. > And *I* thought it was proper etiquette to only reply to the list. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/