From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 31 12:38:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (unknown [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95D714C41; Mon, 31 May 1999 12:37:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA019564195; Mon, 31 May 1999 11:23:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 11:23:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: mladavac@metropolitan.at, luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a two-level port system? (fwd) In-Reply-To: <199905311410.HAA51369@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 31 May 1999, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > It seems to me that you guys are arguing about a problem that doesn't > really exist. Or at least all ideas proposed so far seem to hurt more > than help. ;) Agreed. This whole discussion, I feel, is silly. This is change for the sake of change. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message