Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:58:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> To: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c... Message-ID: <1340992732.19144.YahooMailClassic@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <FDE692FD-8E3B-47A5-80A3-7327135A7725@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=0A=0A--- Ven 29/6/12, George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com> ha scritt= o:=0A=0A> Da: George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>=0A> Oggetto: Re: s= vn commit: r237624 - in head: cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/= common/llquantize cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace/common sys/cddl/co= ntrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace sys/cddl/c...=0A> A: pfg@freebsd.org=0A= > Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.o= rg, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org=0A> Data: Venerd=EC 29 giugno 2012, 12:47=0A> = =0A> On Jun 29, 2012, at 13:35 , Pedro Giffuni wrote:=0A> =0A> > (Sorry for= top-posting]=0A> > =0A> > Actually ...=0A> > =0A> > David pointed out a fu= ndamental flaw on my part.=0A> > =0A> > These are new files under a non-BSD= license. Even when=0A> > they are only scripts used for testing I shouldn'= t=0A> have=0A> > brought them in without -core approval.=0A> > =0A> > I wil= l delete them right away and core shall decide=0A> > afterwards if and how = they can be brought in.=0A> > =0A> =0A> Are the files under a CDDL license?= =A0 Since that's the=0A> point of where you added them I don't think that t= hat=0A> should be an issue.=A0 The issue comes when we might=0A> ship CDDL = code by default, but these are tests and so that=0A> should not be a proble= m.=0A> =0A=0AThey are under CDDL. I re-read the committer's guide and=0Athe= y are right where they are.=0A=0ANow .. David pointed out I am not respecti= ng the code=0Aprovenance since I didn't add them to the opensolaris=0Avendo= r area, but these files are copyrighted Joyent=0AInc (not even Illumos) so = I cannot put them there=0Aunless we create a new vendor for Joyent.=0A=0AAs= George notes, they are only test files so we can=0Alive without them if th= is is too much mess.=0A=0APedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1340992732.19144.YahooMailClassic>