From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 3 9:38:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF0937BB7B for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA59197; Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:35:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 09:35:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200004031635.JAA59197@apollo.backplane.com> To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD random I/O performance issues References: <70590.954758102@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : : : :On Sat, 01 Apr 2000 17:03:24 PST, Matthew Dillon wrote: : :> I've committed it into -current and will MFC it into :> -stable in a week if there aren't any problems. I :> do not intend to MFC it into 3.x. : :Hi Matt, : :I'd like to suggest that a week is not enough. Given that we seem to be :back on the bleeding edge in CURRENT, a lot of folks who might be able :to send valuable feedback are less likely to manage a system update :within the short space of 1 week. : -stable (4.x) is operating under different rules at the moment due to the theoretical BSDI code merge in -current. People are allowed to commit new work. However, in this particular instance the I/O performance fix was really nothing more then a simple bug fix, so it would be MFC'd quickly in any case. :Ciao, :Sheldon. : -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message