From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 16 22:40:01 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2FD106566C;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:40:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:39:48 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200804161256.56633.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<11167f520804161438q1f92000dsd57c5409350dedb9@mail.gmail.com>
	<200804161818.35543.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200804161818.35543.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200804161839.52682.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add stubs for Linux 2.6.17 syscalls
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:40:01 -0000

On Wednesday 16 April 2008 06:18 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 April 2008 05:38 pm, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> > would a patch like this make linux flash9 work?
>
> I wasn't able to make linux-flashplugin9 work with amd64 but I know
> set_robust_list syscall was used by linux_base-f8 +
> nspluginwrapper. Can anyone try it on i386 and let us know?

BTW, functionally it does not change anything but it complains 
unimplemeted syscalls are used, i.e., just making them visible.  With 
or without it, it should return ENOSYS.

Jung-uk Kim