Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 10:41:01 -0700 From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <ebf59baa7f9a37c0b8126b350f78e516@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <efb517d3c13e0e2f4ce5b3fd49aacf62@ultimatedns.net> References: <20170929183448.GA175@gmail.com> <77334fc4-b64e-45ed-a443-4076e47acee3@BY2NAM03FT029.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com> <BN6PR2001MB173012B1DBBC7BB0A900DAA2807E0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <COL004-MC4F55p68V8z000ac00b@COL004-MC4F55.hotmail.com> <BN6PR2001MB17309E4F64000C0C00DA086D807F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CAN6yY1ukz_gn3Ny4J52qoq0KjGmvDxLEZrBenXPA7o-YC%2BHSyg@mail.gmail.com> <b7e9e82e-f657-3c6a-a96a-f0ee486f12f5@FreeBSD.org> <BN6PR2001MB17303D6CF6F112F87D91114C807C0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <01cc2d44-ba19-1618-a31a-760218545e12@FreeBSD.org> <BN6PR2001MB17307EED118D3427F07F59BE807D0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>, <20171002092849.GA48518@gmail.com>, <efb517d3c13e0e2f4ce5b3fd49aacf62@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 09:44:26 -0700 "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> wrote > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:28:49 +0100 Matt Smith <matt.xtaz@gmail.com> wrote > > > On Oct 02 09:07, Carmel NY wrote: > > >On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: > > > > > >>On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote: > > >>> 1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does > > >>> the user have to determine that what is out-of-date and feed them to > > >>> poudriere manually and in the proper order? > > >> > > >>Automatic. > > >> > > >>> 2. From what I have read, the user is required to install each package > > >>> manually. Is that correct? > > >> > > >>Poudriere builds a repository. You then have to type 'pkg upgrade' or > > >>'pkg install foo' to update your live system. Most people do not find > > >>this particularly taxing. > > > > > >From the "pkg-descr" file: > > > > > >poudriere is a tool primarily designed to test package production on > > >FreeBSD. However, most people will find it useful to bulk build ports > > >for FreeBSD. > > > > > >While it will undoubtedly work, it is still more complex than the average > > >desktop user requirers. Synth fits the bill nicely by being, for the most > > >part, easy to understand and run. I am already on my forth "ports > > >maintenance" program having used portmanager, portmaster, portupgrade and > > >now synth. At this point, I would almost rather switch to a new OS before > > >abandoning synth for something that IMHO is just overkill for the average > > >user. > > >Just my 2¢. > > > > > > > Of course if you did move to a different OS then the chances are you > > would be using a binary package repository and not compiling any > > software from source. So you wouldn't have any choice over the options > > that these packages were built with. > > > > If you are happy enough to do this then you may as well just abandon > > building ports on FreeBSD anyway and just use the pkg tool from the > > official FreeBSD repository. This is the easiest option surely. > > > > For what it's worth I've used both synth and poudriere and whilst > > poudriere is slightly heavier to use because of the requirement to > > create a build jail first, once that step has been done it's pretty much > > identical to using synth really. > > > > My workflow is simply this: > > > > poudriere ports -u (update the ports tree) > > poudriere bulk -j 11 -f pkglist (check for any updates and build any > > packages listed in the pkglist file) > > pkg upgrade (upgrade any upgraded packages) > > > > That's it. The same workflow on synth is: > > svn up /usr/ports > > synth build pkglist > > pkg upgrade > > > > Pretty similar if you ask me. OK you could use synth upgrade-system and > > do it in one command rather than two but then you're building everything > > on the host system and not a specific list. Also I like the extra pkg > > stage, it gives me a chance to see what pkg is about to do and abort it > > if it wants to do something insane. > I think you really made the point here, Matt; > IMHO It's really a Chocolate vs Vanilla, Broccoli vs Corn situation. > Both are fine; but not everyone is willing to have/choose either, and Ahem, s/either/both/g the above line should have read both, not either. sorry. :( > someone(TM) is going to have to step up, and ensure that *both* are > available, before both parties are going to be satisfied/happy. :) > > Just the way I see it (my .02¢) > > So. Has John paid the necessary penance yet? ;) ;) > > --Chris > > > > -- > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ebf59baa7f9a37c0b8126b350f78e516>