From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 13:19:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF77E16A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:19:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E185B43FDD for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:19:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2003112121195001400oqr7ne>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:19:50 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 247C93A; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:19:50 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001c01c3afa8$a6220600$5401a8c0@borg.fielden.com.au> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 21 Nov 2003 16:19:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <001c01c3afa8$a6220600$5401a8c0@borg.fielden.com.au> Message-ID: <44znepto5l.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: DG Subject: Re: compiling ext2fs into a kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:19:51 -0000 "DG" writes: > My first question is: what documentation is there on the available kernel > options? [I don't run 5.x, but...] I thought that was supposed to be a NOTES file in the conf directory. Looks like it doesn't include EXT2FS; that might be worth a bug report. > My second question (coming from a different open source UNIX-like operating > system background) is: how does one specify to compile a 5.1 feature as a > module as opposed to directly into the kernel, or are all module-capable > features automatically compiled as modules? The latter should be the case by default.