Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 13:16:15 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@checker.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rfork patch, please comment Message-ID: <199910281916.NAA29823@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910281156500.10856-100000@current1.whistle.com> References: <19991028181029.A85ED1FD7@io.yi.org> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910281156500.10856-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I know I've been a fan of using rfork for native threads, > (and all the support that we need for a linuxthreads is already there > (see the linuxthread PORT to freebsd)). But I was speakin gwith terry the > other day and he managed to convince me that there is an even better way > that we could do this. > > It's really quite elegant. And that elegant solution would be.........??? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910281916.NAA29823>