From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 19 16:39:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F67916A400 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers.102a7e@mired.org) Received: from mired.org (dsl092-153-074.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.153.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADD3B43D45 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:39:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers.102a7e@mired.org) Received: (qmail 86721 invoked by uid 1001); 19 Apr 2006 16:39:03 -0000 Received: by localhost.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:39:00 -0400 (EDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17478.26532.75132.709164@bhuda.mired.org> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 12:39:00 -0400 To: cokane@cokane.org In-Reply-To: <346a80220604190900i3bfc3b54v93a4c6c30f0dfc4f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060419040716.4F26116A45F@hub.freebsd.org> <20060419095207.GC19339@wjv.com> <44462C07.4030903@centtech.com> <444634C1.9080206@centtech.com> <346a80220604190746n69a74a67te58599f743312cab@mail.gmail.com> <17478.22833.727876.432169@bhuda.mired.org> <346a80220604190900i3bfc3b54v93a4c6c30f0dfc4f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Mike Meyer Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fancy rc startup style RFC X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:39:09 -0000 In <346a80220604190900i3bfc3b54v93a4c6c30f0dfc4f@mail.gmail.com>, Coleman Kane typed: > On 4/19/06, Mike Meyer wrote: > How about we all discuss good choices for "default" colors? Depends on the goal: do you want the default to work for everyone, or do you want the default to be prettier and/or better for most people but absolutely suck for a few? I like the former. Which means the defaults need to be black and white. Given a sufficiently flexible system for picking colors, we can use bold/underline/reversed as "colors". That might work well under that constraint. http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.