Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:06:10 -0800 From: Gary D Kline <kline@thought.org> To: Justin Hopper <jhopper@spry.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cvsup Handbook Example Message-ID: <20030221200610.GA37950@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <1045856524.23001.515.camel@home.gusalmighty.com> References: <20030221151412.D867B43FBF@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1045854810.22986.479.camel@home.gusalmighty.com> <1045856524.23001.515.camel@home.gusalmighty.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:42:05AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > Sorry, this of course should have read 'after 665 and before 667'. > > On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 11:13, Justin Hopper wrote: > > Hello unamed person, > > > > For the rest of the world that doesn't follow Christian Mythology, 666 > > is just the number after 667 and before 665. I've used 666 in several > > coding examples, usually for client/server socket daemons, as most > > people don't have anything using port 666. > > > > Would you rather that the good people of FreeBSD be barred from using > > particular numbers? This could pose a problem. (I think this unnamed gentleman [[ women are seldom so dense ]] merely dosn't understand 0ctal. Mayhaps he could use binary: "10110110 || 110 110 110". Hm?) -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030221200610.GA37950>