From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 16:56:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BA916A41F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB66F43D49 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:56:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so908493wxc for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:56:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GMpwfAvZ64OzbYHdBJCAdwxDpkUv133z5+coEx6jq1wKEjseAr1/XQ9iu/owFIobK/ZjkncDI3uHG8rYpQl/OIX1j1myAHXWDGbIr/B54EgJNifzqD3TTZTwcW0VS3KlevKWv5Yj8zBmRxehNtFOEB1x5GkyAOBU3eGsS9sjzLk= Received: by 10.70.24.6 with SMTP id 6mr2189168wxx; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:56:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.9.10 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:56:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e8236f0511040856gc2b6c07vf65277d2bd5f4e75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:56:24 +0000 From: Joao Barros To: Nathan Vidican In-Reply-To: <436B915A.2070805@wmptl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <436B915A.2070805@wmptl.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new filesystem improvements in 6.0-RELEASE, require newfs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 16:56:25 -0000 On 11/4/05, Nathan Vidican wrote: > Most notably amongst the improvements/additions to 6.0-RELEASE, are those= in the > filesystem area. In performing a system upgrade, does one need to newfs/f= ormat a > given partition with a new file system to make use of these optimizations= , or is > the bonus simply in the kernel/filesystem support and sticking with the > current UFS2 partition (5.3-RELEASE/amd64) will step-up to it? As you nicely put it: the bonus is simply in the kernel :) -- Joao Barros