From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec  4 19:38:05 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 79ADA16A4CE; Sat,  4 Dec 2004 19:38:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2215443D31; Sat,  4 Dec 2004 19:38:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: from [10.0.5.50] (adsl-64-171-184-243.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
	[64.171.184.243])
	by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id iB4Jc0C4001510
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:38:01 -0800
Message-ID: <41B211EA.6070807@root.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:37:14 -0800
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
References: <20041203120940.5573116A515@hub.freebsd.org>
	<41B091E8.2060807@root.org> <20041204024212.K18185@mail.chesapeake.net>
	<20041204075743.GL69608@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041204075743.GL69608@elvis.mu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:38:05 -0000

Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> [041203 23:42] wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Nate Lawson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I think that breaking vprint() into multiple lines is not a good idea.
>>>Bruce pointed this out to me when I was doing the v_tag changes a while ago.
>>
>>What's the reason?
> 
> 
> possibility of it being non-atomically written to the log files?
> 
> -Alfred

No, grep and general style considerations.  At the risk of ruining the 
daemon discussion, I think it would be good to have a style(9printf). 
It would be good to have some more consistency about CaPs, etc.

-- 
Nate