From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sat Sep 6 07:27:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA15223 for multimedia-outgoing; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 07:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA15218 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 07:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id PAA13585; Sat, 6 Sep 1997 15:15:42 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199709061315.PAA13585@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: intercepting vat (or other rtp) traffic To: bad@uhf.wireless.net (Bernie Doehner) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 1997 15:15:42 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Bernie Doehner" at Sep 6, 97 10:08:50 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Does it have to be vat? Can you use rat (assuming it's stable enough > yet)? source for rat is not generally available and cannot be redistributed. in any case what I want to do is completely independent from the application that's why I am going for #2 > > 1) patch the network module of vat and intercept traffic there; > > 2) program vat to use 127.0.0.1 and let my program talk to vat > > using the same address. My program would basically do address > > translation in both directions. Cheers Luigi