From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sun Jun 4 8:51:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9732C37B6F8 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 08:51:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p23-dn01kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.24]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id AAA06396; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 00:50:59 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <393A790C.AC486039@newsguy.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:43:08 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Matt Heckaman , FreeBSD-ADVOCACY Subject: Re: FreeBSD/Solaris References: <87371.960111225@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > I think this is a rather unsupportable statement and would be very > curious to know where this guy gets his statistics from. Remember, as > the guy making such broad claims, it's up to him to cite his sources > and support his assertions, not the other way around. Being required > to accept such statements without supporting evidence makes you > equally susceptible to claims that Elvis wrote 73% of the kernel while > "channeling" through several members of the CSRG and it's up to you to > prove otherwise if you want to dispute the point. :-) I thought we were not supposed to discuss the Elvis thingy in public? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@yet.another.bsdconspiracy.org Hmmm - I have to go check this. My reality assumptions are shattered. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message