From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 25 21:14:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3399153CC for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:14:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40346>; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:11:43 +1000 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:12:46 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: undelete In-reply-to: To: dscheidt@enteract.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <99Aug26.141143est.40346@border.alcanet.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Scheidt wrote: >What, exactly, is broken with LFS? Or, at least, when did it get broken? To expand on Jordan's response: It was removed at the end of January 1998 with the following commit message: }Retire LFS. } }If you want to play with it, you can find the final version of the }code in the repository the tag LFS_RETIREMENT. } }If somebody makes LFS work again, adding it back is certainly }desireable, but as it is now nobody seems to care much about it, }and it has suffered considerable bitrot since its somewhat haphazard }integration. } }R.I.P Further discussion on this topic probably belongs in freebsd-fs, rather than here. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message