Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 09:51:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD current) Subject: Re: sup is fetching whole src tree Message-ID: <199506031651.JAA15278@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199506031040.UAA14164@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 3, 95 08:40:44 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >> > >Perhaps the compressed commit logs should be excluded from the CTM > >> > >distribution? There's not much sense in mirroring them (if someone > >> > >needs them, he can still fetch them from freefall). > > >What logs where ? would they be any good to help me trawl gnu/usr.bin/groff > >loking for what broke the overstrike macro I used to use ? > >(that broke a few weeks back) ? > > Just the usual cvs commit logs. They _are_ more useful than `cvs log' > output for finding things - I just tried `cvs log' in groff and got > 390K of output for the 777 files in groff although we've only made > small changes to about 77 of these files. groff hasn't changed > significantly since 1995/03/17 when ngroff was named to groff. Gee, and just 40 mails ago you thought that they where pretty useless!! Gota love it when this happens. So I take it I wont have much of a problem convincing _you_ that we should keep them in the ctm and sup file collections :-) -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Custom computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506031651.JAA15278>