Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:04:15 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <mailinglists@toco-domains.de> To: Murk Fletcher <murk.fletcher@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port request: pngout (image compression) Message-ID: <5644C68F.6030501@toco-domains.de> In-Reply-To: <5629110E.9040303@toco-domains.de> References: <CAH=3fOOQUyfXS4MTZjtfKTpaEW_Wg=ZAmQcmGKHyLpas8RTjfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH=3fOMAjg9fpMWZdAvVP0o%2BY6nT6RcGYiMM32PCMhvkQcAzWg@mail.gmail.com> <5620CF6D.70005@toco-domains.de> <CAH=3fOOEmp23uODV0KqYjgj2eb5Tn4hO%2Bdbw9siFbaWr_wN3_A@mail.gmail.com> <5629110E.9040303@toco-domains.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Murk, >> Thank you sir -- great stuff! > > You're welcome :) > > Sadly i'm still waiting for a response addressing the license questions. And the waiting is going on. Hopefully i will get a reaction after the third email. > Also i wasn't able to fix deskutils/ladon because of its npm > dependencies. But this is needed to get jpeg-compress into the ports. > > My last idea is providing a precompiled version of ladon. This is not > wanted in the portstree by default, but there are some exceptions from > this rule. I will test if the port works this way and let the committer > decide if this is acceptable as a workaround. In the meantime another option arrived. Olivier Duchateau worked on getting Node.js ports into tree, which would definitely fix deskutils/ladon. A link to his status report: https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-07-2015-09.html#Node.js-Modules I've already contacted him, but he mentioned, that there is only a very slow progress in getting his work into the portstree. But there is already a list of over 100 ports prepared, including all ports we need for ladon. Greetings, Torsten
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5644C68F.6030501>