From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Mar  1 18:25:21 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA14362
          for chat-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 18:25:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns1-04.netcom.ca [207.181.94.68])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA14356
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 18:25:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.4/8.8.2) with SMTP id WAA09724; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 22:24:23 -0400 (AST)
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 22:24:23 -0400 (AST)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>,
        "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge 
In-Reply-To: <18642.857267867@time.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970301222350.16024D-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> > Im assuming you twiddled the jumpers to get the higher rate, what gives you
> > confidence that your not going to smoke your CPU? :)
> 
> Intel, actually. :) According to what I've heard, even when you get
> the chip hot enough to cause it to shut down, all you have to do is
> wait for it to cool down and it's back in business with no ill
> effects.  I think John tried some pretty hallucinatory clock speeds
> in his own case before finally settling on 233 as the only reliable
> overclock setting. :-)
>
	Anyone have any similar over-clock recommentation for the P133? :)
More power/speed is always nice...