From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 09:49:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4D199842B for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from dec.sakura.ne.jp (dec.sakura.ne.jp [210.188.226.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31308B69 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from fortune.joker.local (180-198-137-134.nagoya1.commufa.jp [180.198.137.134]) (authenticated bits=0) by dec.sakura.ne.jp (8.14.3/8.14.2/[SAKURA-WEB]/20080708) with ESMTP id t6C9nAPp017632 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:49:11 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:49:10 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will 10.2 also ship with a very stale NTP? Message-Id: <20150712184910.2d8d5f085ae659d5b9a2aba0@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <20150710235810.GA76134@rwpc16.gfn.riverwillow.net.au> <20150712032256.GB19305@satori.lan> <20150712050443.GA22240@server.rulingia.com> <20150712154416.b9f3713893fe28bfab1dd4d7@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.3 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:49:13 -0000 Wow! Thanks for your time and quick response. I'm looking forward to seeing it MFCed. :-) On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:56:26 +0000 Xin LI wrote: > I've spent some time on the MFC, the testing would still take some time > (likely a day or two) and once that's finished I'll ask re@ for approval. > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:44 PM Tomoaki AOKI > wrote: > > > As I already mentioned in another post, head has 4.2.8 p3 in-tree. > > > > So the answer should be MFC before creation of releng/10.2 is planned > > or not. > > > > > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:04:43 +1000 > > Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > > > On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren < > > cnehren+freebsd-stable@pobox.com> wrote: > > > >On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote: > > > >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge. > > > > > > > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure > > > >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports". > > > > > > That's a non-answer. It just changes the question to "why bother to > > > include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway". > > > > > > -- > > > Peter Jeremy > > > > > > -- > > Tomoaki AOKI junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Tomoaki AOKI junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp