Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:37:21 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc:        net <net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: routed && route6d removal proposal
Message-ID:  <dcd96b43-9d0b-2fe5-d08c-cb366cd1be6f@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <202006230533.05N5XdsD013964@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
References:  <202006230533.05N5XdsD013964@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
23.06.2020 12:33, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:

> Can you agree with that logic Eugene?

I'm not against keeping routed(8) in the base while it has happy users raising voice for it.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dcd96b43-9d0b-2fe5-d08c-cb366cd1be6f>