Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:06:18 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: re <re@freebsd.org>, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Subject: Removing CVS from base Message-ID: <201208231606.18346.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGE5yCox=R2eF2woH12sKRVbhbQDF%2BxPT=d5G-cLHDOv9bVfmw@mail.gmail.com> References: <1345697446.84337.11.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <1345729674.52121.4.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <CAGE5yCox=R2eF2woH12sKRVbhbQDF%2BxPT=d5G-cLHDOv9bVfmw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:41:03 pm Peter Wemm wrote: > * Don't expect to see any 10.0-alpha/beta/rc/release/stable to *ever* > make it to an official cvs tree. It's probably time to move a > freebsd-ified cvs from head to ports. I think this is a bit premature. Just because we are moving away from using CVS as FreeBSD's scm doesn't mean CVS isn't a useful general-purpose tool still. For smaller repositories that don't need fancier things like branches, CVS is quite useful and far lighter weight. I could see moving csup out to ports, but not necessarily CVS. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208231606.18346.jhb>