Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:56:52 +1000 From: Benno Rice <benno@jeamland.net> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP Message-ID: <426305D4.2000505@jeamland.net> In-Reply-To: <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050415173711.I658@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <20050416150810.GD5452@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9935398F99CEE762D059F082 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 05:41:57PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: > >>While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is not needed >>by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not aware of any >>application that uses it. Any thoughts on this? > > > Oh. Don't remove that. Userland PPP needs it. People who are using ADSL > modems of any kind will still need it. I concur. I'm working on some ADSL drivers at the moment and there are people wanting to use PPPoA where this is very useful. If userland PPP switches to Netgraph then I'm fine with this going, but until then I'd rather it stayed. -- Benno Rice benno@jeamland.net http://jeamland.net --------------enig9935398F99CEE762D059F082 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCYwXX4u8rkiw+H90RAu3aAJ0Y/x0Wm6ZX4XOTGPyCX23HPTF+uwCfc/PH yggiermr4fo9gC5nxJ6CGxo= =lReb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9935398F99CEE762D059F082--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426305D4.2000505>