From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 12 21:57:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94FAD85 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94B6722C9 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9CLvTaC002958; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:57:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9CLvTln002957; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:57:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:57:29 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Joe Nosay Subject: Re: /usr/src/lib/msun errors Message-ID: <20131012215729.GA2932@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20131010013338.GA10499@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131012032258.GA98799@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:57:35 -0000 Please, do not top post. It loses context. On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 04:05:27PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Steve Kargl < > sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > Is the ALPHA base stable enough to do porting of applications? > > > > > > > Huh? What do you mean? People have been running freebsd-current > > for years and porting applications to FreeBSD. Alpha is simply > > a point in time for freebsd-current. > > I was rebuilding world using an older CURRENT base and the src from > 10/07/13. The build kept breaking with libiconv, msun, and a few others. The problem you had with msun was caused by you adding additional options to CFLAGS in make.conf without actually understand what those options may do. > This affected both the base and 3rd party. The system is still usable but > it isn't stable enough for building a 3rd party application. Yes, it is stable enough. Remove your custom CFLAG options. > If I reinstall the base with CURRENT from 10/07/13 to present, will > it be stable enough for building 3rd party? Of course. But, you need to read src/UPDATING and ports/UPDATING. -- Steve