From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 19:59:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BA016A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:59:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2D643D53 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so642716rne for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Ta/gHNQ/OBKgjqlG4sLW4Z2qfFoJxHBrIQ00WpUdphm0n1SL3t+2mxs3TJT+IgJZ4L31erkWpCQl7Bgr9F9yeT0GlfaMaoyv6Mzpl0ARPA15dPJG17Y9WaVgjU9y18x+x5ko+n2kzS0z+fMjL27Rox/kEHyc0Puwf6QEgsKilcU= Received: by 10.38.68.47 with SMTP id q47mr324604rna; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.151.63 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18f6019404120811592394ac9d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 From: Aaron Glenn To: "Devon H. O'Dell" In-Reply-To: <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Justin Hopper Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:59:06 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Justin Hopper wrote: > Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself > before you are rude towards others. Turn's out *I* missed something. I'd have sworn up and down 5.3's jail implementation had multiple IP support. I distinctly remember reading that tidbit and thinking how great it was. I can't find what I thought I read and it turns out I'm completely wrong. And I apologize if I came across rude. That wasn't my intention. /eats crow > Are you sure you toyed with it? And in a production environment, I'd > still recommend 4.10. Yes, I'm sure. Regards, aaron.glenn