From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Jun 25 06:51:29 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA23235 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA23229 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 06:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id GAA21346; Wed, 25 Jun 1997 06:51:31 -0700 (PDT) To: Andreas Klemm cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Advice for a 10/100 MBit PCI card In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 1997 14:48:02 +0200." <19970625144802.57953@sunny.wup.de> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 06:51:30 -0700 Message-ID: <21343.867246690@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Intel Pro 100B. You need to read the mailing lists more often - this has been discussed to death. :) Jordan > Hi ! > > Need a quick advice, which 10/100 MBit Tisted pair PCI > card works best supported and reliable under FreeBSD 2.1 and > 2.2. > > Theres a good chance, that our company will get a FreeBSD > communications server soon ... !!! > > And I urgently need some help, because of the pitfalls > I heard about supported and not supported DEC Chips and > such .... > > What PCI cards are in use on freefall and wcarchive ??? > Do you think FreeBSD-2.2.2 is ok for a reliable server > or should I better choose 2.1.7.1 ??? > > I think the FreeBSD-2.2.2 machines are well enough and > one could use the -current ports, which might be an > advantage over the older ports .... > > Andreas /// > > -- > aklemm@wup.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH > Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ - Support Unix -