From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 18 9: 2:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from luna.lyris.net (luna.shelby.com [207.90.155.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC23C153CF for ; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:02:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kip@lyris.com) Received: from luna.shelby.com by luna.lyris.net (8.9.1b+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA24804; Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from (luna.shelby.com [207.90.155.6]) by luna.shelby.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.50); Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:01:38 -0800 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 09:01:38 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy X-Sender: kip@luna To: David Greenman Cc: remy@synx.com, bmilekic@dsuper.net, julian@whistle.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? In-Reply-To: <199911181535.HAA15679@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SMTP-HELO: luna X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: kip@lyris.com X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: dg@root.com,remy@synx.com,bmilekic@dsuper.net,julian@whistle.com,freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: luna.shelby.com [207.90.155.6] Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > FreeBSD has used wakeup_one() for this purpose since I wrote wakeup_one(). > In fact, it was the main reason I wrote it. Shortly after doing this the Apache > Group changed to using file locking to coordinate access to the socket and It may not be understanding the dialog correctly, but it seems like optimizing FreeBSD for a poorly architected web server, however widely used, is a sub-optimal allocation of effort. -Kip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message